The Last Great Commons
From the Village Green to the Divided Highway In pre-industrial England, every
village—and even many urban neighborhoods—had a central shared space: the
commons. Think of it as a kind of miniature Central Park, proportioned for small
communities. These were lands not owned by anyone, yet essential to all—used for
grazing animals, gathering fuel, or simply being together. They were the social
and cultural heart of everyday life. That changed with enclosure. Starting in
the 18th century, these communal lands were subdivided, fenced, and converted
into private plots. The shift was disruptive and often devastating—people were
displaced, and long-standing traditions collapsed. But enclosure also played a
foundational role in modern Europe. It encouraged agricultural efficiency,
increased land productivity, and helped lay the groundwork for Britain’s rise as
an industrial and food-secure power. Still, something was lost. And it wasn’t
just the land.
The Original Tragedy of the Commons
The term "tragedy of the commons" emerged from this era. It described how shared
resources, when left unmanaged, were depleted by individual self-interest. The
commons, after all, had often become exhausted, stripped of productivity by
overuse. Enclosure promised a solution: by assigning ownership, you could assign
responsibility. But while enclosure solved some problems, it created others. It
stripped away democratic, collective space. It privatized not just land, but the
possibility of shared identity, access, and voice. That legacy—both its benefits
and its failures—echoes loudly today.
America's Roads: A New Commons
Fast forward a few centuries, and look around: America’s roads have become the
last great commons. They are the open space we all use, even if we don't think
of them that way. Highways, streets, and freeways carry commerce, family,
culture. They are the literal and figurative arteries of the country. The road,
like the old English commons, became a symbol—of freedom, mobility, and
possibility. But that freedom has turned against itself. Congestion now clogs
urban cores. Accidents and emissions mount. The car-dependent design of modern
American cities separates people from necessities—and from each other. The
system is overcrowded, overstressed, and no longer works the way it once did.
The New Enclosure: Autonomous Systems
Enter autonomous vehicles. Their promise is clear: safety, efficiency, cleaner
cities. But to fulfill that promise, our roadways must become highly managed
environments. Vehicles will need to talk to each other and to the roads
themselves. Algorithms will calculate traffic flows, prioritize deliveries, and
direct passengers. Roads will become programmable systems—less like highways,
more like code. And that means the enclosure of the open road is already
underway.
What We Risk Losing
As with the English commons, this enclosure will bring undeniable progress. We
may reclaim urban space for housing, parks, and people. Walking may become
easier, safer, and more pleasant. For many, these are gains worth celebrating.
But we will also lose something harder to quantify: spontaneity, freedom, the
mythos of the open road. The American highway system has long served as a
metaphor for freedom. It’s embedded in everything from Jack Kerouac’s On the
Road to Springsteen lyrics. As it vanishes into a seamless, driverless grid, we
will mourn its loss—just as the English once mourned the loss of their fields.
Lessons from Europe—and a Warning
Travel to older European cities, and you can still feel what urban life was like
before the dominance of the automobile. Narrow, walkable streets. Corner stores.
Public squares. Places built for people, not machines. These cities are not just
picturesque—they’re functional. They allow life to happen on foot, at a human
scale. By contrast, American cities built for the car often neglect the
pedestrian entirely. Sidewalks lead to nowhere. Grocery stores and schools are
out of reach without a vehicle. The design reflects the values of the system
that shaped it. The coming transformation is a chance to redesign again.
A New Kind of Commons
As autonomous systems reclaim roads from individual drivers, vast resources will
open up—physically, economically, and socially. Departments of transportation
and planning agencies will become stewards of this new space. They must not
repeat the mistakes of the past. This time, we know what’s at stake. The profits
of this transformation—whether measured in land, data, or mobility—must be
reinvested in the people. Roads must remain a shared good, not another asset
captured by the powerful. If the road was America’s last great commons, then its
enclosure demands our attention. Not to stop it—but to get it right. We owe it
to ourselves to do better than the English did in the 18th century.
The Road to Driverless Cars -- Safety Systems
One unique characteristic of autonomous vehicles is their potential to be safer than the mode they replace. Cars today are safer than ever, but their use still results in over 35,000 deaths a year in the U.S. alone. Safety systems are now becoming available with the potential to mitigate the results of driver error, and avoid some accidents entirely. Advanced safety systems - lane departure warnings, collisions alerts, even direct accident avoidance - are finding their way into an increasing number of luxury and even mid-price vehicles. At this point most of these features are optional and rely on consumers to value them highly enough to pay more.This is reminiscent of the of the early stages of the process that saw the adoption of passive safety systems such as airbags and ABS. Consumer interest may lead to active safety features being adopted, perhaps more quickly than ABS and airbags, which had minimal adoption rates early in their introduction (even thou...
Comments
Post a Comment